Skip to main content

“Patient’s Log”: Track your Insurance Calls Like a Provider (In 60 seconds)

Stop scribbling on scrap paper. Here is the exact system I use to hold insurance companies accountable (and keep track of what has been said).

In my last post, I talked about the importance of documenting every single interaction with your insurance company. But let’s be honest: when you are managing a chronic illness, working, or just living life, finding a notebook and a working pen while on hold is just one more hurdle.

My husband and I realized early on that we needed a system that was fast, shared, and impossible to lose.

Our solution? A simple Google Form.

It lives as an icon on our phone home screens. When we get on a call, we tap it, fill in the blanks while we talk, and hit submit. It automatically saves everything into a spreadsheet that we can search later.

Why This Works Better Than a Notebook

  1. It Prompts You: You never forget to ask “Who am I speaking with?” because the form requires you to type it in.
  2. It’s Collaborative: If my husband takes a call, I can see the notes instantly on my computer. No more “Did you call them?” arguments.
  3. It Creates a Timeline: When you need to file a grievance (like I did), you just open the spreadsheet and copy-paste the entire history.

The Fields You Need (Steal My Form)

I created a free Google Form with these specific questions. You can copy this exact structure:

  • Patient calling about: (Checkbox: … Names of those in the household, etc.)
  • Date called: (Date picker)
  • Who contacted? (Checkboxes: Benefits, Care Management, CVS Caremark, HR, etc.)
  • Method of contact: (Checkboxes: Phone, Email, Secure Message)
  • Did I record the call? (Yes/No – Check your local laws as many areas require you to ask permission to record.)
    • My Script: “I need to record this call so I have a record of what to do next. Do I have your permission to record?” Note. Be sure to note this to any new call participants.
    • Note: If they say “No,” I immediately ask: “Since you are recording this for quality assurance, can I request a copy of that recording for my records?” (This usually changes the tone of the conversation!)
  • Name of representative: (Crucial! Always ask for this first)
  • Reason for call: (e.g., Prior Authorization, Billing Error, Benefits Question)
  • Summary of call: (What did they say? What did you say?)
  • How long were you on the call? (This is important evidence for complaints)
  • Action items: (What did the representative promise to do? What do you need to do?)
  • Follow-up date: (When should you check back?)
Header for your form.
Settings for the form. Some are personal, but this let’s me and Josh know who entered the data.
I have the email addresses required by default and the same for questions. (You can set some as not required.)

How to Set It Up

  1. Go to forms.google.com and click “Blank Form.”
  2. Add the questions listed above.
  3. Click “Send,” copy the link, and email it to yourself and your spouse/caregiver.
  4. Pro Tip: Open the link on your phone, tap “Share” (iOS) or the menu dots (Android), and select “Add to Home Screen.” Now it looks and acts just like an app.

The Result

When my pharmacy billing nightmare happened, I didn’t have to rely on my foggy memory. I opened my spreadsheet and saw exactly who disconnected on me on January 29th, and exactly what “Curtis” told me on February 6th.

That data wasn’t just notes; it was evidence. And evidence is the only thing that wins insurance appeals.

Disclaimer: I am a Speech-Language Pathologist and person with chronic illness, not an insurance broker or attorney. This post shares my personal experience and is not intended as legal or financial advice.

Progress

What is progress?

Merriam-Webster includes the following in the definitions of progress:

  • “a forward or onward movement (as to an objective or to a goal) : ADVANCE”
  • “a gradual betterment especially: the progressive development of human kind”
  • “to move forward: PROCEED”
  • “to develop a higher, better, or more advanced stage”
Know history – diverse history. Use research to improve education and healthcare so we can move forward not backward.
Image created by Dr. Nixon’s description provided to Adobe AI.

Imagine.

Pause. Imagine that it’s 1990. You are in a wheelchair. You do the same work as your peers, but you get paid less. You can’t go to a movie theater because there aren’t accessible seats.

Do we really want to go back to that?

That was life before the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 that includes Section 504. Section 504, the section being the one currently being challenged by attorneys general in 17 different states with Texas v. Becerra.

In an essay written in Time on February 19, 2025, Rebekah Taussig wrote:

“In many ways, Section 504 has operated as an almost invisible protection – easy to take for granted. And in doing so, we’ve been able to continue the fiction that disability is something that happens only to others. The undeniable fact is that every one of us will acquire a disability if we live long enough. Disability is an experience we can move in and out of over the course of our lives, and disabled people are the only minority group anyone can become a part of at any moment. Section 504 is not a law for “those people.” …

As with much of U.S. politics right now, Texas v Becerra feels like a reckless attempt to pull us back to a former time. But there is one crucial difference between 1977 and 2025. More than one generation of disabled children has grown up under the protections Section 504 provides us. And while the politicians are still reciting the same script, our revolutionary predecessors gave us a new story. We are a valuable part of our communities, we belong here, and we’ve been shown how to fight.”

Civil Rights Protections aren’t Red Tape

Why do you think civil rights laws such as ADA, the Civil Rights of 1964, and Individuals with Disability Education Act of 1990 (among others) were passed?

It was because people were (and still are, just check Supreme Court Cases) treated differently based on their race, religion, national origin, (dis)ability, gender (and gender identity), and sexual orientation.

Image created by Nixon Speech and Language, LLC.

Recently, the Trump administration froze the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice and changed the board of the EEOC in a manner that has many concerned. These groups are there to protect people’s civil rights against discrimination by employers, schools, businesses, landlords, law enforcement, and more.

If you think that shouldn’t be a concern, just take a look at what Rep. Rich McCormick (R-Ga) said when asked about school lunches after Trump proposed a federal funding freeze that could affect nutrition support for children: “Before I was even 13 years old, I was picking berries in the field, before child labor laws that precluded that. I was a paperboy and when was I was in high school; I worked my entire way through”.

Use of the phrase “back in my day” to dismiss concerns

Just because something was one way in 1954, doesn’t mean it should continue – particularly when it comes to civil rights.

Disclaimer. This post is not medical or legal advice.

The information provided in this blog post is for educational and informational purposes only. It is based on historical research, analysis, and interpretation, which may be subject to varying perspectives and ongoing scholarly debate. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented, I do not guarantee its completeness or infallibility. Historical accounts can be complex and nuanced, and my interpretations reflect my understanding of the available sources at the time of writing.

This blog post may also contain personal opinions and reflections on the historical events and figures discussed. These opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of others. They are offered as a basis for discussion and further exploration of the topic.

Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult multiple sources to form their own informed opinions. I am open to respectful discussion and feedback on the content of this blog post, and I acknowledge that historical understanding can evolve over time. Any errors or omissions brought to my attention will be considered and, where appropriate, corrected.

By reading this blog post, you acknowledge that you understand and agree to the terms of this disclaimer.




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *